Trump.Dating is an odd site, and not?just because it featured a?convicted sex offender¡¯s smiling face on its homepage. More on that shortly.

It¡¯s?strange?in?nearly?every way a dating site could be?strange. Its all-caps slogan ¡ª ¡°MAKE DATING GREAT AGAIN! FIND YOUR PRO-TRUMP MATCH TODAY¡± ¡ª?may be the least weird?thing about it.

The site¡¯s?premise, at least, makes some sense: ¡°like-minded people have a far better chance at success in a relationship,¡± as?a news release?announcing?the site¡¯s launch put it this month.?¡°Users can rest assured every person they are talking to is behind the president, with red, white, and blue blood that flows for America each and every day.¡±

Nothing wrong with that. Who wants to have a border wall argument over wine? But?Trump.Dating¡¯s peculiarities begin to surface with the first mouse click and never quite stop.

There apparently are no pro-Trump gay people

The common denominator among the site¡¯s users is supposed to be that they, unlike most opinion poll respondents, support President Trump. But?try to register, and the first thing you¡¯re asked is whether you¡¯re a ¡°Straight Man¡± or ¡°Straight Woman.¡± Gay people (let alone?bisexual, transgender or queer) simply don¡¯t exist in the menus.

While Trump is certainly loathed by many?gay?rights supporters, mainly for policies rolling back freedoms and protections?of transgender people, he definitely has?gay fans.?He?has even embraced them on occasion ¡ª giving a shout out to the ¡°LGBTQ community¡± in his Republican National Convention speech, for example.

Donald Trump holds a flag given to him by a supporter during a 2016 campaign rally.?(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

But?being gay is simply not an option on Trump.Dating, which is not the only conservative matchmaking site to exclude people who aren¡¯t straight. You¡¯re either a man seeking women or a woman seeking men.

You can, however, specify a romantic interest in ¡°military men/women¡± regardless of your gender. So?Trump.Dating?appears?to tolerate a very specific form of bi-curiosity.

Okay, let¡¯s talk about the child sex?conviction

As of Monday, Trump.Dating¡¯s poster photo?showed an authentic pro-Trump couple from North Carolina: Jodi Riddleberger in a pink MAGA hat, and her husband, William Barrett Riddleberger ¡ª who the News & Observer subsequently reported has a 1995 conviction for ¡°indecent liberties with a child.¡±

Barrett?Riddleberger didn¡¯t respond to requests for comment, but his conviction was common knowledge in?Guilford County, N.C., where he and his wife are active in local Republican?politics.

He was accused of videotaping himself having sex with a 15-year-old when he was 25, according to the Greensboro News & Record. When details of the crime?went public during a race in 2011,?Jodi Riddleberger wrote on Facebook that her husband had since undergone ¡°redemption.¡± Here he is in present times:

As of Tuesday, the?Riddlebergers¡¯ photo had undergone a retraction from Trump.Dating¡¯s homepage. Instead, visitors are greeted by a stock?photo of a middle-aged couple who?can also be found advertising gum recession treatments.

¡°The couple¡¯s history was not revealed to us in anyway beforehand or while the photo was live on the site,¡± Trump.Dating spokesman Sean McGrossler wrote in a statement. ¡°They are not spokesmodels. They are not spokespersons. They no longer represent the Trump.Dating image.¡±

The statement also mentioned that a previous version of the site incorrectly allowed married Trump supporters to look for dates.

Who¡¯s behind the site, anyway?

Trump.Dating¡¯s?spokesman, as mentioned above, gave his name as Sean McGrossler. A Feb. 5 launch announcement on the Daily Caller originally listed the site¡¯s founder and owner as Sean McGrossier, with an ¡°i,¡± though it was sometimes spelled as McGrossler in the same advertisement.

McGrossler (the site¡¯s spokesman) did not immediately respond to questions from The Washington Post about whether he is also McGrossier/McGrossler (the site¡¯s owner), and, if so, which spelling?of his name is?correct.

For some reason, Sean McGrossler¡¯s byline on the Daily Caller is tagged as ¡°ariddleberger¡± ¡ª the last name of the former model convicted of a sex crime, whom Sean McGrossler (the spokesman and possibly also the?owner) said?no longer represented Trump.Dating.

McGrossler/McGrossier did not respond to questions about whether Riddleberger is involved in running the site. Riddleberger couldn¡¯t be reached, either.

The people on it

We just wrote?700?words about the curiosities of Trump.Dating without?discussing?the dating experience, which is frankly a little weird, too.

Like, what are we to make of kyschyanne, a 21-year-old user from Garland, Tex., whose bio line is ¡°white power¡±?

To be fair, the site¡¯s user base may be distorted by all the attention it¡¯s received as a result of Riddleberger¡¯s criminal history. The Washington Post, among others, had to make a fake user profile to find kyschyanne. Who¡¯s to say kyschyanne isn¡¯t fake, too? Or hailxxxy ¡ª ¡°I love trump with a dying passion.¡±

Pink News, an LGBT site annoyed by the site¡¯s exclusion of LGBT people, went exploring with its own fake account and found a match named ¡°Gayintruder555,¡± which it figured was a troll.

While it¡¯s unclear how many real people use the site, Trump.Dating now describes itself as ¡°mega-viral,¡± and at least some of the profiles look authentic.

Like Footlettuce, 23, from Tuskegee. ¡°Love of god Great at basketball.¡± Sounds nice.

Whether the matches Trump.Dating makes are any good is another question. The Post had trouble getting the site¡¯s preferences to work correctly. It kept offering us page after page of white people, even after we¡¯d asked to match only with ¡°Thai women,¡± which for some reason is its own special?category in the ethnicity menu.

We have no plans to go on a date, regardless. If you do, let us know how great it is.

More reading:

Internet scammers are terrible. This troll is their nightmare.

People can¡¯t stop reading a professor¡¯s theory of a Trump-Russia conspiracy ¡ª true or not

A live stream of Shia LaBeouf chanting was disrupted by Nazi-themed dancing. Then things got weird.