The justices said the lower courts were too restrictive in denying funds in one of two cases in which they sided with defendants.

Conservative justices indicate that it could violate free speech rights; liberal justices also question parts of the law.

Case could have implications for ¡°sanctuary cities¡±; Justices also rejected death penalty lawsuit.

The justices stayed out of the gerrymandering fight, to the advantage of Democrats in the state.

A law targets ¡°fake¡± clinics that the state says trick women and put their health in danger, but these centers say the government can¡¯t force them into speech they don¡¯t believe.

Does Minnesota¡¯s law banning ¡°political¡± clothing and buttons violate the First Amendment? Supreme Court considers both sides.

But justices worry about a broad rule that might open police to flood of lawsuits

Conservative majority says law doesn¡¯t provide even those held for years a bail review.

In an hour-long oral argument, justices largely echoed their stances from two years ago.

Judges in California and New York have blocked the administration from ending the DACA program ¡ª which protects some young undocumented immigrants ¡ª on March 5, as planned.

Fane Lozman¡¯s second case to reach the high court has the backing of free-speech advocates who say he was improperly arrested at a city council meeting.

Justice says his colleagues are turning the Second Amendment into a ¡°disfavored right.¡±

The decision means 2018 elections in the state will probably be held with districts far more favorable to Democrats.

The court victories are on hold except in Pennsylvania, which is awaiting the Supreme Court.

A Supreme Court spokeswoman said the justice had symptoms from low blood sugar but is fine.

Load More